Debiasing Investors with Decision Support Systems:
نویسندگان
چکیده
This research presents evidence that decision support systems can play an important role in debiasing behaviorally-challenged investors. An empirical study involving 119 participants provides strong evidence for the existence of cognitive biases in investment decision-making and demonstrates the effectiveness of decision aids in lowering the negative impact of such biases on the ability of investors to make sound investment decisions. Additionally, such decision aids are shown to be more valuable in decision environments where the bias level is likely to be higher.
منابع مشابه
Corrigendum to "Debiasing investors with decision support systems: An experimental investigation" [Decision Support Systems Volume (46/1) 399-410]
Corrigendum to “Debiasing investors with decision support systems: An experimental investigation” [Decision Support Systems Volume (46/1) 399–410] Gokul Bhandari , Richard Deaves , Khaled Hassanein c,⁎ a Department of Management Science and Marketing, Odette School of Business, University of Windsor, ON, Canada b Finance and Business Economics Area, DeGroote School of Business, McMaster Univers...
متن کاملFraming effect debiasing in medical decision making.
OBJECTIVE Numerous studies have demonstrated the robustness of the framing effect in a variety of contexts. The present study investigated the effects of a debiasing procedure designed to prevent the framing effect for young adults who made decisions based on hypothetical medical decision-making vignettes. METHODS The debiasing technique involved participants listing advantages and disadvanta...
متن کاملIT Support for Reducing Group Judgment Biases
Systematic biases have been found in both individual and group judgments, calling for research into debiasing approaches. Although individual debiasing has been studied to some extent, no parallel effort exists for group debiasing. This paper advocates the use of group support systems (G&S) for group debiasing and presents a theoretical perspective on how the impact may be achieved. Special att...
متن کاملSupporting Decision Makers with Knowledge Management Systems
This study compared the effectiveness of two knowledge management system designs in supporting individual decision makers in a predictive judgement task. The black-box versus white-box system design was varied to allow for automating versus informating support in cue weighting and combination stages of the judgement process. The main findings indicate that only the white-box system design was e...
متن کاملImproving Forecast Accuracy by Guided Manual Overwrite in Forecast Debiasing
We present ongoing work on a model-driven decision support system (DSS) that is aimed at providing guidance on reflecting and adjusting judgmental forecasts. We consider judgmental forecasts of cash flows generated by local experts in numerous subsidiaries of an international corporation. Forecasts are generated in a decentralized, non-standardized fashion, and corporate managers and controller...
متن کامل